The Safest & Least-Safe Cars Of 2006

Every year, the Insurance Institute for HighwayMinivans
Safety (IIHS) rates passenger vehicles' ability toNo vehicles earned a gold or silver rating, most
hold up in a crash as good, acceptable, marginal orbecause their seat/head restraints only earned
poor. They break cars down into four sizemarginal or poor ratings.
categories: large, midsize, small and minivans, andLeast-Safe Vehicles of 2006
base their ratings on front, side and rear safetyThe following vehicles earned "poor" ratings on
tests.both the side and rear safety tests that the IIHS
The vehicles that earn good ratings in each testconducted.
category (front, side and rear) are given goldSide impact tests measure how well a passenger
ratings, while those that earn good front and sideis protected when a vehicle is hit in the side by an
ratings and acceptable rear ratings are given aSUV or pickup.
silver rating.The rear safety tests measure how well a seat
Test results are only comparable among vehicleshead restraint protects a passenger against neck
of similar weight, as larger vehicles are generallyinjury in rear impacts at low to moderate speeds.
more protective than smaller ones.Hyundai Elantra
IIHS Top Safety Picks for 2006Kia Optima
LargeMazda6
GOLD: Ford Five Hundred with optional sideNissan Sentra
airbagsSuzuki Forenza
GOLD: Mercury Montego with optional side airbagsToyota Corolla
SILVER: Audi A6Mazda MPV without optional side airbags
MidsizeNote: The National Highway Traffic Safety
GOLD: Saab 9-3Administration (NHTSA) also conducts safety
GOLD: Subaru Legacytests for frontal and side impacts (not rear).
SILVER: Audi A3However, their rankings are based on a different
SILVER: Audi A4scale (one to five stars) and test for different
SILVER: Chevrolet Malibu with optional side airbagsthings than the IIHS tests. When the same two
SILVER: Volkswagen Jettacars are compared using both IIHS ratings and
SILVER: Volkswagen PassatNHTSA ratings, the ratings are often
Smallcontradictory.
GOLD: Honda Civic