Engine Sludge Taints Toyota's Reputation

The issue could have ended calmly on March 1,been enough issues with Toyota in the past
2001 when an arbitration panel unanimouslycouple of years that they don't have the spotless
concurred that the Toyota Motor Corp. was liableimage they had a couple of years ago," said Karl
for the damage of Jeff Meckstroth's two-year-oldBrauer, the editor in chief of , an automotive
Lexus RX300 sport utility engine. However, theresearch Web site. But he adds that problems at
dispute worsened when two representatives ofToyota attract a disproportionate amount of
the automaker packed up their papers andattention because of the automaker's sterling
referred casually to other identical cases theyreputation for quality. "Most companies wouldn't
were handling.get noticed for these problems."
"Then we had our suspicions up that this isn't anDaimlerChrysler AG's Chrysler Group and
unusual case, that Lexus knows about theVolkswagen AG are among the automakers that
problem, and has formed a response - just deny,have confronted complaints about sludge in their
deny, deny," said Meckstroth, a 47-year-old Newvehicles. "There are reasons to believe that the
Orleans stockbroker. "We decided to sue." Hisengine design could be contributing to it, but there
case sprouted into a class suit to include prior andare also reasons to think that lack of maintenance
current owners of about four million Toyota andor proper customer care is contributing," Brauer
Lexus vehicles complaining about engine sludge.said. "Everything I've read indicates something kind
Engine sludge is caused by the accumulation ofof in between."
gelling or solidifying oil. It usually occurs atGary Gambel, an attorney at Murphy, Rogers,
temperatures lower than 100 degrees Celsius.Sloss & Gambel in New Orleans, argued that
Sludge is a cause of major engine problems. ItToyota's engines had a defect giving them a
deprives the engine of the required lubrication. Inpropensity to develop sludge. "The terms of the
addition, sludge could necessitate an opportunesettlement and the settlement itself have no
engine replacement.finding of defect in the product," Toyota
Toyota has agreed to settle the case last fallspokesman Xavier Dominicis said however.
however it maintains that its engines were not"They're not saying these engines are predisposed
defective. The automaker said the settlementto sludge."
terms mirror a program to reimburse customersToyota remains among the quality leaders in
for sludge-related engine damage or repairs that itvehicle manufacture. But if complaints about auto
put in place in 2002. The said settlement isparts not only the engine but EBC brake pads,
expected to be approved by a Louisiana statebrakes, suspension and more, keep coming, the
court.reputation linking to quality will be compromised.
With a single engine replacement costing"The sludge issue was a significant blow," said Art
approximately $10,000, the gross amount couldSpinella, president of CNW Marketing Research
run into the billions. However, the taintedInc. in Bandon, Ore. "Toyota's in the position that
reputation of the automaker is worth more thanGM was in back in the 1970s. A lot of people
that. Toyota is not the only automaker that haswere buying GM products in the '70s because
been confronted by engine sludge problems. Butthey were GM products, but they had fractures
the high-profile case is the latest in a series ofat the edges. It took 15 years before GM started
recalls. This situation is suggestive that Toyota'sto suffer from that long-term negative
controls are not foolproof.word-of-mouth." At Toyota, he said, "It's going to
"It would be accurate to say that there havehurt them if they don't turn it around."